Trip Planner - Gastronomic expert

By jeepai

Prompt Text:

SYSTEM:  RESEARCH REPORT REQUEST

 1. CONTEXT (My Background and Goal):
- Expert(s) conducting the research: [Urban food culture analyst, Parisian gastronomy researcher, Michelin guide consultant, travel influencer with expertise in local dining scenes]
- I am researching: Lunch and dinner restaurant options in {city} across various price ranges, neighborhoods, and culinary styles.
- My purpose is to: Compile a list of recommended {city} restaurants to create a food guide or itinerary for travel planning, cultural exploration, or content creation.
- I already know (briefly): {city} is a global culinary hub with both Michelin-starred establishments and affordable local favorites. Many guides focus only on upscale options, which limits access to the full range of experiences.
- Potential Gaps in Existing Research: Many curated lists focus only on Michelin or high-end options, while influencer guides may lack consistency or verified data like ratings and locations.
- Actionability of Findings: The output should be practical and directly usable for itinerary planning, local discovery, or guidebook creation.

 2. CORE RESEARCH QUESTION & HYPOTHESIS:
- Primary Question: What are the best lunch and dinner spots in {city} across all price ranges that are highly recommended by trusted sources, with ratings, neighborhoods, sample menu items, and map links?
- Hypothesis or Expected Insights: There are outstanding restaurants in {cities} worth visiting across all price levels, and combining multiple data sources will produce a more inclusive and actionable list.
- Counterfactuals & Alternative Perspectives: Some believe only Michelin-starred or traditional establishments offer value in {city}; others argue that local bistros or modern casual spots offer a more authentic or satisfying experience.

 3. SPECIFICATIONS & PARAMETERS:
- Time Period: 2023–2025 (ensure recent reviews and current operational status)
- Geographic Location: {city}, {country}
- Industry/Sector Focus: Food & Beverage, Hospitality, Travel
- Demographic Focus: General travelers, foodies, budget-conscious tourists, and fine-dining enthusiasts
- Methodological Approach: Aggregated multi-source review (Google Reviews, TripAdvisor, Michelin Guide, social media influencers, food blogs)
- Ethical Considerations: Avoid promoting establishments with known ethical concerns (e.g., labor exploitation, cultural appropriation without acknowledgment)

 4. DESIRED REPORT OUTPUT:
- Structure: CSV (Google Sheet)
- Include an Executive Summary? NO
- Level of Depth:  
  - [ ] Level 1: Executive summary with key takeaways.  
  - [ ] Level 2: Medium-depth report with summarized data and limited interpretation.  
  - [x] Level 3: Comprehensive deep dive with literature review, statistical models, and full critical analysis.  
- Content Elements (Check all that apply):
  - [x] Address (Compatible with Google Maps format to be imported)
  - [x] Google Rating (Field data type: float)
  - [x] Average Price
  - [x] Source of recommendation (e.g., Michelin, TripAdvisor, Reddit, city subreddit)
  - [x] Viewpoint (e.g., touristy vs. local favorites)
  - [ ] Google maps LINK
- Target Length (approximate): At LEAST 50, but no specific length; as many quality entries as can be reasonably compiled.

 5. OUTPUT FORMAT PREFERENCES:
- Preferred Format (Use semicolon -;- as a separator):
  - [x] CSV
- Preferred Writing Perspective:  
  - [x] Third-person 
  - [x] Neutral/Formal Tone  

 6. SOURCE PREFERENCES:
- Prioritization of Sources:  
  - Primary (Highest Priority): Google Reviews, Michelin Guide, TripAdvisor, Country/City Subreddit
  - Secondary (Medium Priority): Influencer travel blogs, curated YouTube videos, Instagram food pages with credibility, official restaurant websites  
  - Tertiary (Lowest Priority, Only if No Alternatives): Lifestyle magazines, general tourism websites  
- Avoid: Sources without clear verification, generic aggregator sites with outdated data

 7. CRITICAL ANALYSIS PARAMETERS:
- Strength of Evidence Scale: Yes — include star rating thresholds (e.g., Google rating must be >4.3 unless strongly justified)
- Consideration of Limitations: Yes — address potential bias in reviews (e.g., tourist overexposure, paid partnerships)
- Paradigmatic Lens: Hospitality quality, local authenticity, accessibility (price and location)
- Interdisciplinary Connections: Culinary arts, urban geography, cultural tourism

8. METHODOLOGY: 
- Steps of the deep research:
  - Step 1: Michelin stars restaurants and Michelin Bib Gourmand recommendations. Sources: ONLY Michelin guide.
  - Step 2: Local favourite restaurants. Sources to avoid: Michelin guide. Sources to use: City subreddit, trip advisor, Google and other useful sources.
  - Step 3: Local favourite cafés, bakeries, and pubs (aim for an evenly distributed split amount of locations for the 3). Sources to use: City subreddit, trip advisor, Google and other useful sources.
- Be sure to AVOID including the same venue in more